Quote:There is absolutely no advantage to having it be 64 bit or locked to Vista or above. Last I checked NetMarketShare Windows XPs market share was below 5%, not 30%. Quote:It Fascinates Me U Have Brains 2 Write A Program But Not The Sense 2 Make It Work On 30% Of The World's PCs! That said, I'll try to reply to that email in more details: It is possible to build XP compatible versions, but it always requires a lot of time of patching the latest sources and compiling different versions. I dropped Windows XP support, because it's a pain to maintain Windows XP versions of tools like x265, mkvtoolnix, ffmpeg which by default do not build any more with Windows XP. Make yourself useful instead of crowding the wrold with more useless, unusable $hit like 'MPV' = OMFG ~ as if a player should even exist without the ability 2 configure things? LOL!!!Īll that work U have done, 4 nothing, because it won't run on so many MILLIONS of machines, & 4 NO good reason! =))ĭisregarding the 'tone' of that email I'll try to reply to it here: If U want 2 do something useful, take the new version of Handbrake (which supports VP9), & add whatever other codec support U can (AV1 & WVC1?) & release it as an alternative version of Handbrake. GET A GRIP! Still using the 'ancient' version of 'Handbrake' encoder interface because your junk, like most alternatives, is INFINITELY WORSE because it won't even run on XP. Stuff written for XP can work on ALL of those OSes. There is absolutely no advantage to having it be 64 bit or locked to Vista or above. Quote:Hybrid: It Fascinates Me U Have Brains 2 Write A Program But Not The Sense 2 Make It Work On 30% Of The World's PCs! Here's the mail I got from someone calling himself 'Balkan Guy': Since I got a mail from a troll yesterday I thought I address the issue of why I dropped Windows XP support.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |